Most enterprise AI stalls between pilot and production. Security reviews, data rules and unclear ownership stop it. We build the control layer first: a gateway, a company brain, guardrails and governance. Then we put agents to work on top of it.
Pick the seat you sit in. You'll see the questions you get asked most, and where on this page each answer is.
Most firms start at the top with a chatbot and bolt security on later. We start with where things run, who controls them, and what they can touch. Click a layer.
An agent that reads email, documents and web pages will read an attack sooner or later. So we design every agent on the assumption that some of what it reads is hostile.
Hidden instructions inside an email, file or web page try to take over the agent.
Confidential data slips into a prompt, a log, a reply or a third-party tool.
Someone forges a role, floods the system, or runs up a bill with stolen access.
A compromised package, a silent model change, or a vendor outage.
A simulation of the defense pattern we build into agents. Real systems layer several controls, because no single filter is enough.
We test our own systems the way an attacker would. Our knowledge system has a test where a user forges a higher role to read restricted material. It runs after every backend change, and the server refuses the request.
Your apps never call an AI vendor directly. They call the gateway. The gateway decides who may use which model, keeps the bill per team, and writes the audit trail.
The key decides which models that team can reach. Revoke one key without touching anyone else.
A Canada-only key can't reach a model hosted outside Canada. The call is refused before it leaves. We tested this.
Each key has a spending limit. At the limit, calls stop. No surprise invoice.
Every call is logged: who, which model, tokens, cost. The prompt and the reply are not stored. We checked the logs to prove it.
Apps ask for "fast", "standard" or "deep". We change the model behind a tier without changing the apps, and only after it passes a quality test on that task.
| Time | Key | Model | Result | Tokens | Cost | Content |
|---|
Your documents, project history and lessons learned, turned into one system people can question. It answers with sources, and it respects the same access rules your files do.
Every answer cites the document it came from. Click through to the source. No source, no claim.
Access is checked on the server for every question. A clever prompt can't climb over the wall.
We tag knowledge by depth: the facts, how things are done, and the judgment learned on past projects. The judgment is the part most firms lose.
Closure reports and lessons learned come back at the moment a similar decision is made, not once a year in a binder.
Same keys, budgets and residency rules as everything else.
Illustration with sample documents. Same question, three people, three different views of the evidence.
Four ways to run it. Pick your hardest constraint and we'll show you where to start.
Your EPMO already knows how to govern investment. AI should go through the same front door: intake, scoring, gates and benefits tracking. We set it up so AI ideas compete on value, and risky ones meet a gate early.
One front door for AI ideas, shadow tools included.
Value, risk, data sensitivity and effort, on one scale.
Security and privacy checks before build, not after launch.
Behind the gateway, with guardrails and a named owner.
Hours saved and errors avoided, against a baseline.
A one-page view for the CIO. Keep, fix or retire.
Every AI tool in use, including shadow AI. What data each one touches, where the gaps are, and a ranked fix list with owners.
Acceptable use by role, data handling rules, where a human must approve, who owns what, and a review calendar.
Least-privilege access, injection defenses, data boundaries, human override and monitoring, signed off before go-live.
Six questions, ninety seconds. See how your current AI use stands on the six pillars of trustworthy AI.
Our method aligns with the NIST AI Risk Management Framework and is CPMAI®-aligned. Engineering guidance, not legal advice.
Each step ends with something you can show your steering committee. You decide at every gate whether to go on.
Find out where AI is already in use, where the risk is, and where the value is.
One governed workflow in production. Real users, real data, measured.
Reuse the same controls across more teams. Add the company brain.
We stay on as your AI operations partner, on retainer.
Tools only pay off when people use them well. We train each group on the agents and controls you put in place, from the leadership table to the delivery teams. In B.C., the Employer Training Grant can cover most of the cost.
A 90-minute briefing for the C-suite, VPs and directors: where AI creates value, and where it stalls.
Program details →How to phase, gate and run AI projects. A CPMAI®-aligned specialist track for the people who deliver them.
Program details →Hands-on skills for daily work, with real guardrails. No technical background needed.
Program details →A level-finder places each person, so you train to the gap instead of sending everyone to the same course.
See the training path →Source: B.C. Employer Training Grant eligibility criteria, effective March 23, 2026. The grant is run by WorkBC and the Province of British Columbia. The Province decides eligibility and approval, not ResonAi. ResonAi is not a grant advisor. Third parties cannot apply for you. Confirm current terms at workbc.ca.
Twenty years leading enterprise IT and transformation programs: payroll and HR platforms, workforce systems, PMOs and delivery teams on both sides of the table. Now he builds applied AI for real operations: agents, gateways and knowledge systems that survive the day-to-day. He also teaches project management, so every build comes with a plan and a governance model, not just a demo.
Cross-project failure analysis for a Canadian insurer's PMO, per reporting cycle.
Read the case → PMO operationsEvery call loggedA status and escalation agent that escalates with a written reason and leaves verdicts to humans.
Read the case → Knowledge systems3 corporaProfessional bodies of knowledge turned into systems that answer with sources.
Read the case → HCM implementation10 yearsA decade of implementation judgment, encoded as a system you can question.
Read the case →One page for your CISO, procurement and steering committee: what we build, how it's secured, where it can run, and how an engagement is structured.
Bring the hard ones to a 30-minute briefing, or bring your CISO.
One click: a designed email lands in their inbox with the one-page PDF and a link to this interactive view.